Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache
I know they are very good in shot suppression metrics. I agree. That’s not in dispute
It’s not just me, it’s a good number of the analysts that talk about this being the story of the Flames’ season. They talk about the breakdowns leading to grade A chances.
|
We just keep having the same argument.
Now you're bringing in untold analysts to back up a theory that has no factual data.
Every team turns the puck over. When they do they end up with either shots in close (they're counted) or odd man chances that create high danger chances (they're counted).
There is no evidence that the Flames have found a way to be higher danger than high danger.
And even if they were ... lets give you that for fun for a second ... do you really think they've found a way to be so much worse in generating high danger against than the average high danger chance that it excuses goaltenders that are ranked 29th in the league in save percentage?
Seriously?