Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemi-Cuda
I'm confused, what is the point of a post like this? You make a sexist remark, post-end it with /s and a pre-emptive defense like you expect to be chided, but why?
|
It was absolutely harmless, and honestly, attractive people get attention for being attractive. It's, like, literally how our brains are wired and probably didn't hurt her ascension. I knew nothing about Finland before she was elected. Now I always tune in to Finnish politics because it's neat seeing such a hot chick who knows how to party competently govern the country.
BFD, we don't need to whiteknight somebody pointing it out and honestly it'd be pretty weird to not mention it every now and then. Like, look at Trump. We've all made fun of how he looks. Conservatives campaigned on trying to diminish Trudeau just because he's handsome (nice hair). The basis of political cartoons centre around how politicians look.
The Finnish leader is hot. Guess you didn't notice? Maybe you did, but we're not allowed to say it?
I even disagree that it's sexist. She's a good looking woman Cro finds attractive and made a little post with word play. I don't think anybody on CalgaryPuck needs to get their feelings hurt on her behalf. Sometimes we can still call a hot chick hot without being sexist. Chill, holy cow.