Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
Whatever the solution, I definitely agree that there needs to be an immediate component that is probably force-focused, a long term component that is service focused, and that all solutions need to be narrow in scope and directly address the issue.
The fact that we as a society have put minimal effort into solving this issue and people are suggesting loose, unfocused tax breaks that may have a long term impact on homelessness if we’re lucky is, frankly, absurd. But it shows you why it’s become such a problem. A lot of people aren’t even prepared to approach a meaningful conversation around solutions, let alone actually pursue any of them.
|
I'm with you on this, but the shorter-term is admittedly more problematic and distasteful. I'm 100% in favour of services and proactive solutions (some of which are mentioned by Russic in the post ahead of yours). But the shorter term this policing crackdown and "force" is probably necessary. I'd be lying if I said I was 100% comfortable with my slight, vulnerable appearing daughter set to commute by transit.
So, to restore public confidence in the system and really in the rule of law, I think this kind of crackdown is just necessary. The proactive solutions need to be there, but we're talking about years of implementation before we see any benefit.