Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebot
Well if it wasn't obvious, its pretty obvious your intentions now 
Did you check his more recent articles to the right, more specifically one called Wolfram superpower dated March 23? Or his tweet that has over a million views?
You are doing this dinky googling around people you likely never heard of yourself until a few hours ago on a subject you know little about and not even bothering to find recent articles of said person and their progress. Even an article from a month ago is ancient the way AI is pacing right now. All for the sake of arguing with me when I didn't come here to argue, just give a fun example. |
The article link, for others:
https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/...m-superpowers/
I'll have to do some looking on ChatGPT4, I haven't looked into any of it's features or improvements, other than being aware of the plugin model. The Wolfram plugin has some nice mapping features, so perhaps with it, ChatGPT could give a correct answer, though I'm not sure if it would give a useful one for Calgary.
So it's possible GPT4 invalidates everything Wolfram said about GPT2.5, but it's more likely it has just built on it, which means the fundamentals haven't changed. It's still just picking the next most likely word. And I sure wouldn't be trusting without verifying.