Yeah, just glancing at some of the cited cases and the description doesn't really match the cases at all. The two I looked at dealt with very narrow things, but the AI was talking like they are setting some kind of fundamental precedent about contracts.
Like, does anyone really think it took the Supreme Court of Canada until 2002 to properly decide that civil damages should put the plaintiff in the same position they would have been had the contract been performed? That has been a principle of civil law forever.
The thing just took a very basic case that was presented to it and then pulled up a few mostly irrelevant citations that involved breaches of contract.
I don't know, those examples are pretty far down the list of impressive things that AI can already do. If anything, they make it look way hokier than it is.
|