Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie
If the meaning can be so ambiguous, why should Reimer et al kowtow to the generally accepted meaning that they find so offensive? Why not personally define it as a rainbow jersey, symbolizing the beautiful optical effect that occurs after rain?
Or better yet, the particular rainbow that you believe you will one day see from Noah's Arc after your benevolent god drowns all those evil gays?
|
My gut tells me that if it was a plain black jersey, with bold contrasting writing that read “it’s okay to play if you’re gay”, that they’d still refuse while saying they interpret that differently.