View Single Post
Old 04-01-2023, 09:15 PM   #8157
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roughneck View Post
So her being on the advisories panel wasn’t some death wish to the oil sands? Is the concern that the oil sands’ feelings were hurt by her comments?

And what happened with the “same party, plain and simple” doctrine that it didn’t funnel from the BC NDP to the federal NDP to their underlings in Alberta to follow the party position?
And not even just “some panel,” specifically one “tasked with creating policy recommendations on how to implement the climate plan, address cumulative impacts of the oil sands and recommendations on meeting Canada’s climate targets between 2030 and 2050.”

Something she’s made a career out of across Canada and internationally. Something she has won awards for. Something that has earned her the ear of some of the biggest companies in the world and influenced actual positive change.

She was the co-chair of a committee in charge of making recommendations. And she was extremely qualified.

Meanwhile, the UCP put a catholic pro-life activist with zero experience as an educator in charge of education, where she then attempted to push through a rewritten curriculum that would ensure kids were taught that the Nazis did some good things?

But hey, “both sides have extremists!” Genius stuff.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post: