Maybe I'm misunderstanding the situation with the UCP lady, but I think we're having two different conversations here.
Yes, on one hand, kids will be exposed to all sorts of things and it's only realistic to expect that and prepare them.
However, that's not at all what the UCP lady is referring to... Is it?
My understanding was that the porn reference was in regards to sex-ed and associated images... As in, that's the "porn" the children are being exposed to by their teachers. Wasn't there some push from the right wing nuts that sex ed materials were too graphic? Then, obviously, the gender reassignment comment was just pure BS...
|