Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
Wait, what? No it isn't. Where did this false dilemma come from? The question is whether they're better than if the government had done something different that can be readily identified. The answer to that is not "assuredly yes"; there are many things that they obviously should have done differently.
|
The choice that is constantly presented has been spend or do not spend. That is what I’m addressing.
You’re addressing “yes do something but not that”, which ventures so far into other what-if areas to be a purely theoretical discussion