Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
The whole idea that you need indisputable evidence to overturn a call needs to be rethought IMO. This is true for all sports.
If you're going to stop the game for 5 minutes to review a call, then what you thought in the split second it happened shouldn't be the overriding factor. Yes it should be a factor, but you've already ruined the flow of the game.
The officials should make the decision based on what they think happened considering all available evidence at that point.
|
While I agree with you completely, this would only work in a world without bias. I'd hate to see how often the referees botch a call with absolute freedom and support / influence from the league.