Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebot
Remember this?
https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/trud...ties-1.6291406
https://torontosun.com/opinion/colum...ections-racist
Trudeau was briefed on multiple occasions and ignored warnings, that's why the whistleblower came forward (as well as the two new ones). The cat's out of the bag.
As of right now we don't know of briefings about this new allegation yet, so to insinuate that CSIS didn't do it's job is quite a bit premature and presumptuous? CSIS cannot remove an elected official or dictate who can run on their own, as Trudeau eloquently told us a few weeks ago. CSIS would not detain or arrest Han Dong just because he had a secret meeting with a foreign diplomat as an MP.
You can bet they will wait for Trudeau to deny the new story first, and later provide info that they did brief the PMO's office. There's a reason why we are getting this piecemeal this whole time and why Trudeau was so adamant on Telford not testifying. |
I’m not going to pretend that I know all of the laws regarding what CSIS can or can’t do but I imagine that our top national security agency would have more options available to them for dealing with someone, whether they are an MP or just an average everyday Canadian, who is known to them to be actively aiding a foreign nation in wrongfully detaining Canadian citizens than to just leak the information long after the fact when it happens to relate to a political hot topic.
You’re welcome to explain why you feel that that isn’t the case but can I ask that you try to do so without being so hypocritical or jumping to conclusions that you ought to know(because I don’t think you’re an idiot) that you can’t prove?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho
/\
 /\
Check mate. |
A post full of assumptions and theories that accuses me of being presumptuous while not even responding to the post being quoted is checkmate? I’m not sure I follow what you’re saying here Yoho, am I supposed to be Eminem in the gif?