Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzzy14
I suspect they have provided documents to the news agencies to whom they have disclosed the information on the condition it never be released for fear the content of the documents would expose them.
As an example, if I'm one of three people on an email chain... I'm not going to release that publicly... pretty easy to tell who probably leaked.
|
The only document I noticed that the journalist actually said had been reviewed is the Privy Council Office memo. I would have expected them to say they had been provided with a bunch of evidence to substantiate the leaks if that were the case, at least acknowledging that they have seen and reviewed documentation even if not revealing it, especially given the seriousness of the allegations.
Also, I guess I would kind of expect that CSIS would have a pretty good shot at figuring out who did it anyways, given what CSIS is.
I mean, I would think it's a huge risk to take. I'm not knowledgeable about whistleblower protection laws, but I would assume it would require some evidence of wrongdoing on the part of their management to be able to seek protection, and that seems like it would be a tough thing to establish unless there's something majorly wrong going on there.