Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache
You really don’t get it? Your model’s classification of high and medium danger don’t reflect anything in terms of shot placement. That’s the point
I’m saying the Flames are in fact doing something different, and it’s not the number of chances that go in to the high danger bucket, it’s the number of chances that afford the shooter time and space to place their shots
Even outlined the shots for the team, shot by shot, a whole game to illustrate it.
The Flames aren’t taking the extra time to aim, they are deliberately dumping anything towards net. Their mistakes are turnovers that seem to see the opposing team have a few extra nice unpressured looks a game
I dunno. I really don’t see how you can’t see the difference. Even when spelled out shot by shot.
Maybe you didn’t watch the game?
|
I don't get it? Maybe I didn't watch the game?
Maybe you're being an ass?
It's one game. I'm not disagreeing on one game. In the game story I said it wasn't really on Markstrom and he played pretty well after giving up the first two shots.
But one game doesn't prove an entire event counting system is flawed for one goalie and one team only. It just doesn't.