How much #### does it have to be to qualify as '####ting your pants' though?
Is just a little skidmarks enough? I don't think so. To qualify as ####ting your pants there needs to be a not negligible volume of #### in the underpants. I might even go so far as to say that if there's no possibility of seepage, then you didn't really #### your pants now did you? However this doesn't fully account for wet ####s. If you've got a norovirus or some sort of stomach flu/food poisoning, then it's maybe more akin to wetting your pants than it is globules of ####.
As a non pants ####ter kind of guy, I'm just not sure. Perhaps some of CPs resident pants ####ting experts, of which we apparently have many, can weigh in.
|