Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
I think Walsh just put to "paper" what we are all seeing and hearing. Something is very wrong in the room.
Pair this with Tanevs post game interview and the picture becomes really clear.
|
At very least, Walsh’s cryptic tweet is the perfect nugget for those with confirmation bias who feel like going on a rant about Darryl Sutter (or, less commonly, Huberdeau).
The picture isn’t really clear at all. There is obviously an issue, and maybe it is that the team has quit on Sutter, but the overwhelming number of fantasies people have dreamt up about what it’s like in the room and what everyone they watch play hockey on TV is thinking and feeling has been pretty funny. When it gets to the point where people are saying that any time a team has been good under Sutter it has been to spite Sutter, or reframing the Gaudreau situation as Sutter’s fault, that’s just people believing what they want to believe. And Walsh’s tweet has inspired a lot of that.