Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss
Im not sure it would be. The return would be lousy, but it wouldn't be a boat anchor coming back the other way. You just need one GM who thinks the flames are mismanaging a franchise asset. And the low price does the rest.
Imagine if you could get a 100pt per season player for next to nothing? What GM doesn't want that?
|
Well then why are we making the trade if we're getting rid of him for a bag of pucks? How does it help the organization other than to reduce payroll? He's not that much of a cancer we need him out at any cost. It doesn't speed up our rebuild. We're not signing any big ticket UFAs with the freed up money (or at least I hope we aren't).