Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
I don’t like that question. It’s not an or. It’s should the money be spent on an arena or should that money be left in the hands of businesses and individuals through lower taxes.
Whether or not health care is a good idea or bad idea does not change the value of said arena. The government can collect marginally more or less revenue without significant impact so funding decisions should be evaluated on the independent merits of each proposal and not an OR or which is better basis.
|
I was a poorly worded question on my part. I was trying to say that Smith is trying to buy votes and will do whatever it takes to help her get her a win. For me it's a question of her motives.
Quote:
|
Also your biased because you have your high health care year’s in front of you and your arena going years behind you.
|
It's true that i'm heading into my senior years where I could need more health care, but that's not my reason for my original question. I want a properly funded health care so everyone, regardless of age can get the care they need, and in a timely fashion. I don't want health care short changed due to some arena funding.