[Ozy_Flame]

CNN had already mentioned that the objects were interfering/jamming aircraft sensors.

To note: This object was originally detected over . . . . you guessed it - Alaska . . . . and veered into Canadian airspace. The first one was taken down by the US on the Alaskan northern coast. That now makes two Alaskan-sourced UAP, both times being tracked and engaged.

I'd be curious to see the rule of engagement policy the US/Canada/NORAD/NATO is following on this. You don't just shoot down objects, there has to be a clear purpose and validity to shooting down objects. Was it displaying hostile intent? Was it intended to establish pre-emptive strikes?

I'm assuming the NORAD North Warning System ground radar has probably been picking up multiple objects and a specific response has already been pre-determined to handle similar objects in similar scenarios.

It leads me to believe whatever these are, there is a greater chance if they are part of a fleet. Whether it's Russian, Chinese, or other is really the intriguing part.

For the record, I don't think these UAP at ET. It would be incredibly difficult to bring down objects that fall under the five observables, and to do it multiple times in the same week would be extremely improbable.

I think there's a good chance these are Russian based on proximity alone. They are more belligerent than they've ever been and probably trying to provoke the West into reacting. But who really knows what's going on (at least us plebs).