Quote:
Originally Posted by mikephoen
I don't think a single poster has disputed that the Americans could have done it. What's being disputed is the 'facts' in the article, which look to have all been fabricated by an author who now has an almost 20 year history of making things up and being a conspiracy nutjob.
The article (propaganda really) was crap and sheds no light on who actually blew up the pipes. The suspects remain: USA, Russia, Poland, Ukraine, someone else. If we ever find out, it will probably be decades from now.
All people are mad about is giving a known conspiracy hack more exposure and presenting him as a reliable reporter when he is fully discredited. He certainly could be right that the Americans did it, but he isn't privy to any information that proves it, so it's just one guy who has suspicious motives opinion.
|
Lots of posters have not only disputed that the Americans could have done it, but they labelled everyone in the camp that believes that they could have as pro-Russian.
Is the article propaganda? Sure, it could be. Or he actually did do some investigative reporting in this story, just like he has on stories that were also true.
And please spare me the 'oh you are giving the story more exposure' stupidity. The whole incident is possibly the biggest story in decades, with ramifications that will last decades. How dare people talk about a major news article that talks about it.
