That site demanded so many cookies that I didn't get to read it all.
It always makes me look sideways at an article that uses unemployment rate instead of jobless rate, or doesn't relay the loss/gain of part time vs. full time, or doesn't also relay the increase in new employment aged people to a population in the desired timeframe.
In short, I think that this news will have zero effect on any planned hikes.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
|