Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
This is... frustrating. Does he not understand that this just legitimizes the idiots who call the episode, and things like it, "woke propaganda"? What that means is, "the reason the characters were gay is because they want to send an ideological, politically motivated message that there's a good way to think and an evil way to think, and they made this episode to promote what they want you to believe is the right way to think". And now Offerman is saying, "you're right - that was, in fact, why we made this".
It can't just be "we wanted to tell a love story because it's a good story, both on its own and within the context of the show, and the story we're telling requires that these two characters are gay - it doesn't work otherwise". Just... stop accepting the premise of the debate, for ####'s sake. Just because Tucker Carlson or whoever wants to make a TV show into a cultural battleground does not mean you have to engage.
|
It’s not frustrating, and no offence, but you finding it frustrating is as important as whether people who hate this episode because it has gay characters but the excuse as to why it was made.
A straightforward love story where the two characters happen to be gay men, not because they “had to be,” but because sometimes in life that’s just how it is. And telling those stories is important, especially because helps to fight off the ignorance around these relationships being a normal part of life, whether you think it is or not.