Quote:
Originally Posted by calumniate
Well hey, you do you. Nobody is accusing you of being smart. What happens going downhill through corners or under breaking? Sure this was done 'back in the day', but I wouldn't be promoting it here. Accidents cost lives
|
lol, 'promoting it.' I'm not fataing promoting it. I'm answering a hypothetical question. What happens when you go down hill or brake with the good tires in front? You fataing stop better because the fronts do most of the braking in every car under any scenario, anyway. What happens when you corner? The front tires - you know, the ones that turn and dictate the direction of travel - point where you want to go and slight gas pedal input make you go that way. It's really that simple. If you can't do the exercise of those things in your mind, trust me because I've done it in real life.
Accidents cost lives. Jfc. Wtf is this? If anybody thinks throwing two good tires on the front and two #### tires in the back is a good idea then they are a dope of the highest order. Like, what kind of idiot would you have to be to think that was a good idea. Four good tires is what we should all be on.
If, however, you were sitting in the land of make believe and you had two good tires, two bad tires, a fwd car and it was a snowy day, what would you do? I would put the good tires on the front because I'm not ######ed. If you put the #### tires in front you would be spinning like a clown not even moving from a stop while the good tires just sat there doing nothing to help your cause. Then, say you got going, you would plow out on the first corner as your car wouldn't go in the direction you try to point it since it would lack the grip to actually corner. Finally, say you could go, you would be unable to stop as fast as me because the weight of the vehicle sits primarily over the front tires during braking and your tires would have no grip.
"Accidents cost lives." Are you kidding me? Did you honestly type that with a straight face?