Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
Murray was a great player who would have had a long run of greatness had he not been derailed by injury. Wawrinka was more of a "short high peak" guy who was just unbelievably elite for a short period of time and would go on a run where he could somehow green light everything without missing. Peak Wawrinka beats peak Murray, IMO, and he had the highest highs. But Murray had the better career overall.
|
back when the Big 3 used to be the Big 4, it usually took one of Fed, Rafa or Djoker to stop Murray. the way he consistently met them in the finals and semis of so many big tournaments actually obscures his greatness. in a more "normal" era he easily achieves Agassi/Lendl tier