Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime
She avoided use of the CRA because she didn't want to use income as the marker for who would qualify for inflation support. Based on income alone, almost 100% of AISH would qualify for an income based evaluation, so that's a red herring... she simply wants to give money to people with children, so that she can claim future kissing babies points for the election.
2.3 billion dollars of taxpayer money, and it's going to people making less than 180K/year as long as they have children, while people without children making 24K/year, starve.
As much as posters above want to trump on about Notley's record, the UCP have to eat their own record under Kenney, as well as abominations like this under the first few weeks of Smith.
|
Exactly, she avoided using CRA because she didn't want to be seen cozying up to the Federal Government even though they already have the system set up. Everything will be worse and slower in Alberta but that's SOVEREINGTY BABY! We're building the plane as we try to fly/crash land it.