View Single Post
Old 01-09-2023, 11:51 AM   #9
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

I think many of your grades are really low, but I will take direct issue with the following three...

Quote:
Originally Posted by FBI View Post
Lindholm:

39 GP, 12G, 23A = 35 pts

Projected:

80 GP, 25G, 47A = 72 pts



B- : Doing ok scoring wise but eye test shows him not involved nearly as much as last year.
I think Lindholm has been really good for a little over a month now. He is projecting to be right in line with where I had him for this season.



Quote:
Kadri:

40 GP, 15G, 15A = 30 pts

82 GP, 31G, 31A = 62 pts



B- : Great start, cooled off a bit and to be honest I was hoping for a PPG player. One of the few players on our team that can carry the puck.
Anyone expecting ppg from Kadri was setting themselves up for disappointment. With the Flames centre depth it was always going to he extremely difficult for any of them to hit the ppg mark this year. Kadri looks like he is also fairly close in line to where I had imagined his production.



Quote:
Coleman:

40 GP, 7G, 8A = 15 pts

82 GP, 14G, 16A = 30 pts



C: Hasn't done much until very lately with his new favorite linemates.
Coleman is never going to blow up offensively, and I think the reason he was as quiet as he was through Christmas us because of how he amps up his game through the season in order to be ready to play in the playoffs. We saw some of this last year, and I expect him to continue to get incrementally better as April approaches.


Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote