Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleF
Not everything distills down to people being ####ty human beings. Some companies have archaic processes that need revision. Until it is revised, unfortunately, yes, you need additional details and proof.
But there's also a difference between an archaic and "####ty" process vs a nice or "####ty" way of explaining / enforcing the rule/process.
You can't have people all over the place overwriting processes as they deem fit because they don't like them. That's how control lapses take effect and expose the company to significant monetary and other types of risk. Having someone sit down and review and revise all of the processes then upgrade hand books, explain and distribute it is also not always an easy task.
|
Are you saying a company asking for a doctor’s note is archaic? In my experience companies that don’t have that policy are far more likely to introduce it than companies that do have that policy are to rescind it.