Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
I hope the Flames don't get it wrong on Matthew Phillips and he goes on to be a star. Would think we can all agree on that.
He could be an example of poor development.
But for now I'm still waiting on that list I asked for three weeks ago ... where are the players that should have been recalled in Calgary but were not, walked and became impact players in other cities?
Without that list there really isn't a leg to stand on in my opinion.
|
I'll note that I'm sitting, so standing isn't always necessary!
I'd contend that he could be an example of poor development without that list as well. There is always a first clear failure, so the lack of obvious past misplays doesn't negate the possibility of this being one. I'd also say that "development" is a pretty muddy thing at the best of times. I am sure that there are many players that have received a disproportionately sized chance (for better or worse) to show their stuff before they either did or failed, and that there is not always a compelling reason for it. It is an inexact science at the best of times.
Zadorov even mentioned that he felt he has made big strides this year, and he has been in the NHL a long time now. Development isn't linear and it is tough to say what could be around the corner for a multitude of players. That isn't to say they can all have long and extended "tryout" times or something like that, there simply isn't enough time to give to everyone for something like that and it is too competitive a league anyway. But if you were to give an extended look to someone, a guy who has led the next best league in points may be that guy.
Long way to say I see both sides of the argument, but am definitely in favor of giving some ice time to a guy like Philips over some of the other options for our 4th line. Doesn't seem like it will happen which is too bad, but I'll hope he finds a place that does give him that shot.