Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
Seems like the answer probably comes down to whether you feel like you’ve been treated fairly or not.
If you normally can’t get out of season’s tickets and they let you out of them and refund the remaining with the caveat that you pay the extra on the previous Wrangler tickets? Pretty fair, imo.
If you normally can get out of season’s tickets and have the rest refunded but they’re saying you have to backpay to cover the deal you got on Wranglers tickets, that’s kind of ####ty.
Same policy either way, I understand, but I guess the difference is: have they already done you a favour worth more than the ####ty policy? if so, accept the ####ty policy. if not, I’d be pissed about the nickel and diming.
|
The wierd thing is though that they are refunding whatever part of of the season tickets he can’t use which they probably wouldn’t have to do. Yet then they want to charge him for the wranglers tickets because of T+Cs? I don’t get it. If they were sticklers for T+Cs then why let him cancel the flames tickets if they aren’t why charge him more for wranglers tickets that ended up donated.
I don’t understand the inconsistency.