Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePrince
I can't argue with someone that won't look at or believe data, like how do you refute my second paragraph? It's literally data. Your rebuttal is just "ya but there could be other things in there not considered", with zero actual critical thought put into your claims.
Again, look at the link I posted:
https://www.c2es.org/content/u-s-emissions/
What portion of total emissions is methane? How long does methane stay in the atmosphere? Even if you doubled methane emissions because of the leaks you proudly use as a silver bullet, methane emissions still don't hold a candle to CO2. The methane leaks are also the easiest to address via regulation, which is already being scrutinized by both Canada and the USA. These leaks will be addressed. And you are vastly overstating their impact on the final numbers. They would not change materially so as to completely invalidate the trends. If we only used data that was 100% accurate in making decisions, we would never make decisions.
As the Mark Twain saying goes: 'Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.' So I will sign off. |
You don't appear to be a serious person and look to be topped up with rage, so I'm not going to continue this.