Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
I know. That’s not what we’re discussing. I’m honestly not sure if we’re just talking past each other or you’re dead set on making up things to disagree with as my original statement was pretty well defined and purposeful.
You, again, seem to agree that it is not “basic supply and demand,” which is what I said, and that they cannot (or don’t) just implement a “what the market will bear” pricing scheme (based on the actual definition, not a made up one) so we, again, agree. So I don’t know what we’re discussing.
I know this isn’t what you mean, but it is a little funny to suggest no one would define demand on a yearly basis when we’re talking about a team that changes their pricing structure every year and, if they were smart, would adjust for demand on a yearly basis based on the makeup of the team and local economy lol.
|
I made up nothing. The conversation was:
what will the market bear?
which is the definition of supply and demand
supply and demand includes demand
demand includes future demand (among other things)
This is as straight-forward as it gets. You tried to suggest that being focused on maximizing profit would ignore the future impacts on demand, but that is wrong. People making these decisions aren't that stupid or short-sighted.
You seem determined to find an angle to justify your initial stance - knock yourself out. I am finished with this.