Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
Yeah I agree with most or all of that.
To me last year both the Coleman and Makar goals were bad calls.
But the broader issue is no one really knows which way a call is going to go. The intent of video review is to get the call right, but it seems like when it goes to review a lot of the time it feels like a coin flip.
Something is broken about that.
|
I don't think the Makar goal was bad, I feel it's no different from dumping it in while a guy is offside then you tag the blue line and go back and grab the puck.
But again, it's more of an issue of possession vs non. McDavid didn't have possession, he lost it but was able to retrieve it. It would be considered "delayed" but he was still offside. Had he been determined to have possession, then it's a goal. Makar on the other hand, I do feel he had possession but he didn't touch the puck after it cross the blue line. That was a "delayed" offside until Nuke tagged. Totally different situation.