Quote:
Originally Posted by MillerTime GFG
Lol…come on.
And at this point, I wouldn’t even really call it being optimistic tbh. I’d call it being naive. And not pessimistic…observant. Realistic.
|
You can call it whatever you want, the facts are the facts though. And if stress and negativity are bad for your health, I’m not going to waste them on hockey. But do you.
For the life of me I cannot understand why you would specifically ask for optimists to speak up and then when they do, start calling them naive. You’re just being an #######. Or, a “realistic” ####### if it makes you feel better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by howard_the_duck
I called out your ‘take’ as part of a larger cohort that constantly reminds the critics it’s not worth their time. It’s just endless and equally frustrating as it casts anyone who doesn’t sing the praises of the flames in a lesser light
|
Cool story. Considering my post contained none of that maybe you could find one of those endlessly generating posts you don’t like and use that a jumping off point instead. I made it pretty clear multiple times that people old do whatever they wanted and as long as everyone was enjoying the Flames in their own way that was cool. Nothing about some fans being in a “lesser light” or whatever.