You clearly have a reading comprehension problem and or having a tough time understanding legalities, the legal process and what the difference between the legal system and court of public opinion.
You asked me the following "If what Sean Chu did was morally wrong, which is different than legally wrong to you, what did he do?"
I gave you 2 specific examples: He was an officer who was in his mid 30's and was in contact with an underage teenager. Most likely illegal and morally wrong. You and I don't get to decide the law, that's the courts and the fact is, he wasn't charged or convicted.
If the girl in question was 18 year's old, and like I said, IF, than she would be LEGALLY allowed to be in a relationship or have sexual contact with him legally. This is an example, a hypothetical scenario. This has not happened. Legally that is acceptable but to me, it's morally reprehensible.
Those are your examples that you asked for. Back to your question "If what Sean Chu did was morally wrong,
which is different than legally wrong to you, what did he do?"
Morally wrong and legally wrong are not the same thing. This is where your not understanding the difference. I am sure you and I could find morally wrong things about each other but within the legal system legally.
Here is how the Mayor dealt with the differences when she was asked about a councilor being charged.
Speaking for the first time since the charge was laid, Mayor Jyoti Gondek declined to answer reporters' questions Monday because the case is "a live matter before the courts."
"I can understand everyone's desire to know more about the situation but as I've said, I simply can not comment on this matter at this time," said Gondek.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calga...wyer-1.6683299
I've wasted enough of my afternoon arguing about Sean Chu. Enjoy the game!