Quote:
Originally Posted by curves2000
He was a Cop in his mid 30's hanging out with a young girl who was a teenager. He claims, right or wrong, he didn't know her age but met her in a bar and thought she was 18. As we have discussed, most likely illegal and morally wrong.
If she was 18 and he was in a position of trust and was legally allowed to have a relationship or whatever, that to me is morally wrong but legally ok.
I have said it before and I will say it again since your struggling with this concept. I am not a fan of his, I am not defending him but in the eyes of the legal system, he has not been charged or convicted of a crime.
That is preciously why everybody on council was having a debate about Sean Chu and putting in their opinion's on council but with Carra it's a lot more quite. The matter is before the courts and it's inappropriate for politicians to comment or place influence on the matter.
|
But she wasn’t 18. So saying “if she was” 18 is completely irrelevant.
You yourself are now saying what he did was most likely illegal AND morally wrong, so where is the whining about “name calling,” hash tags, Twitter, court of public opinion, etc coming from?
It’s not that people have trouble with concepts or reading comprehension, it’s that you are exceptionally bad at making a clear and concise point that logically ties together. If everyone is misunderstanding you, guess what? The problem isn’t likely them.