Quote:
Originally Posted by flames_fan_down_under
I believe it says exactly those words in the article.
|
It said in third person "many scientists believe ...". That's a long way from saying "it's widely understood ..." or "most experts agree ...".
The way the article is written, it's pretty clear that it was designed to spread excitment and hype more so than facts.
This is not the first time someone has claimed to achieve net positive energy
https://www.sciencealert.com/for-the...ed-by-the-fuel
So it makes sense to caution people about articles that sound too good to be true. For the record I'm not saying this one isn't, I'm just saying there's often more to a story than this type of article will typically present.