Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
Again, though, I'm talking objectively - its weather-resistant characteristics, insulation, weight, warmth, storage, and other features. If for subjective reasons you just feel like you enjoy wearing the jacket more, or if you just don't care about certain features, knock yourself out. Some people just like the feel of a heavy jacket, like they're wearing a blanket - I can't argue, whatever floats your boat.
On the Porsche front, yeah, 987.2S... it's an objectively excellent choice for a 2 seater manual sports car, price to performance, particularly because of where the engine is. There are very few alternatives that aren't front-engine. I'm not sure what other automaker you could look at to perform the same way for around $50-60k used.
|
You understand how justifying the Porsche as objectively excellent under a very specific collection of features and not just as “a car” is silly when you’re evaluating CG not based on the specific collection of features it provides but just as “a winter jacket” right?
On a purely functional, objective basis, owning a Porsche and justifying it as an objectively excellent choice is a lot more ridiculous than doing so for a Canada Goose jacket.
I think it’s cool if you think your Porsche is the best and Sliver thinks his Canada Goose jacket is the best. Both are really great at what they do. Doesn’t need 15 paragraphs to figure it out.