Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
Wait... You've just argued for two pages about a play you didn't even watch until now, when you're effectively just watching to retroactively confirm your own tired, idiotic arguments about making the incompetence of officials moot? That's rich.
|
I watched it live but had had some drinks and couldn't remember if they had all their timeouts left. So I went back and watched to see just exactly how ridiculous you're being (hint: it's a lot).
Quote:
Just FYI, if the Seahawks get that turnover, the Raiders' win likelihood drops from about 40% to about 4%. So, yeah. Effectively game over, especially in that deflating a circumstance.
|
These numbers sound totally objective and scientific.
Your defense couldn't stop the Raiders at all, but it's completely unfathomable that they could have tied it up with effectively two minutes of time left?
Quote:
I think it's pretty obvious that you're just trying to defend the integrity of results in a fake league because your team happens to be doing well this year, and might be a Super Bowl contender... well, I'm telling you that if they win - which they probably won't anyway - it won't mean anything at all. And if they lose due to terrible officiating, I will find it very, very funny.
|
Welp better tell the NFL to cancel the rest of the season or stick an asterisk next to this year's Super Bowl champ because some random man-baby on the internet threw a hilarious tantrum.