Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3
44 Billion is only the valuation because that's what he paid.
Whats that revenue? What's the earnings report say....
GM has 25x the revenue, ignoring the fact they are in completely different industries apples to apples Twitter would be sitting at around 6100 employees
(I do accept your argument that a company with 5.1B in revenue should usually be able to carry 7500 employees, I'm just saying your comparison is not valid).
|
Yes but the point is he's in trouble because he paid 44 billion for it, it's not the staff's fault, not even the lack of income or the loses, none of these things is that big a deal, he happily carried Tesla under the same circumstances for years, the reason it's a problem is he borrowed 44 billion to buy it