I don't understand people saying he never apologized. I mean he publicly apologized, there are quotes in stories where he's doing so unequivocally. Then there is an apparent court mandated apology which people seem to acknowledge he made. Yet I still see posts saying he has refused to apologize or doesn't think what he did warrants an apology. I cannot reconcile these things.
If you're saying he only apologized because he had to or it's not credible to you because he's trying to salvage a pro hockey career, that's a different argument, although it kind of eliminates the possibility of an apology in circumstances where someone is facing charges.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|