What is the premise you started with when you started the article?
Honest question
Was it that the Flames have drafted poorly? Developed poorly? Or that they aren't giving young kids enough chance.
It seems like you started with a conclusion that the Flames failed to give some guys a real chance, and the you found a data point that supported that.
Love your work generally, but I think it would be a better balanced piece if you didn't start with your conclusion already in mind (which my impression is you did).
Intended to be constructive criticism not harsh.
|