Quote:
Originally Posted by OptimalTates
Look I'm not going to respond anymore because you're clearly not reading posts and are looking to attack anyone who disagrees with your disgusting takes. Get your last word in like you need to while feeling like a victim.
But for clarity, I have made TWO posts tangentially talking about Ian Cole (another post about Kane, and another about police for a total of four posts in this thread).
Perhaps you have me confused with another poster because not once said that she was definitely raped. I used "alleged" every single time while bringing up the possibility that it was a troll, something I haven't ruled out despite your false claims (I should hire a defamation lawyer lol).
I have simply tried to provide you rationale as to why, if she was raped, that she might still not go to the police or want to remain anonymous. I gave you links from a law firm to read.
The only time I spoke definitively was when you used the wording "If it happened then she owes it to herself and possible other victims to cooperate." It was a stipulation that you created; IF it happened she OWES this. I said it's gross telling any rape victim that she owes anyone anything using your own caveat that "IF" it happened.
|
Good, we will agree not to respond to eachother. I never attacked you, you attacked me. It was you who said when I asked why she would be comfortable telling the entire world about it that brought up protecting other victims by doing so. Then you about faced and tried to say she should not have to say anything...except she already did. The problem with your take is you are looking at it from a he is guilty point of view regardless of what you say. If she was comfortable enough to announce to the world what happened then she would be comfortable enough to follow through with any investigation imo. When sexual abuse victims are traumatized by the events they endured and can't talk about it they don't go screaming it to the world so your argument is invalid in this case. What is really "grosse" is that there are people like you that always believe the alleged victim. Perhaps even more "grosse" is that you think a woman that was sexually assaulted and felt comfortable enough to shout it out to the world should not follow through to perhaps prevent someone else from going through the same traumatic experiences. So in the end it adds up that you would rather see sexual predators protected so they can reoffend over a victim working their way toward being able to come out with their story. Can't say I remotely agree with that but for you and those that thanked your post, you do you. Disturbing.