Quote:
Originally Posted by TheoFleury
Violent video games weren't sanitized, I agree. That's not what I meant though. I was merely comparing the reaction to their existence as far as the morality police are concerned. Ironically, the left fought off the right then, and rightfully so. Interesting to see the left weilding the cleaver now. The right doesn't like that for sure, but their agenda has changed over a couple decades as well
I didn't mean that the style of humor was totally eradicated fwiw... it's a process. I'm sure by 2030 we'll have more concrete laws as opposed to the pre-canceling we see now from the people who themselves just don't want to be officially canceled right out of the game
Also. I'm not even 40. Can't age shame me. I'm not totally out of touch
Honestly, I'm more the type that wants to see the world burn anyway
We are in the end game of capitalism, a true dystopia fueled by liberal hysteria
George Orwell wasn't daring us to one-up him, but here we are lol
|
Do you really fear that more concrete laws will be made restricting free speech against LGBTQ people by 2030? I mean human rights legislation and the kangaroo court that is the Alberta Human rights commission are pretty strict.
Video games is an excellent example of why this just isn’t a big deal. If there is demand for a thing the thing will exist regardless of moral outrage and panic. Do you see a difference for a lack of market demand for a product and cancelation? How do you differentiate?
Who do you see as being canceled in the humour space for something unjust?