Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
If that's the real assessment(meaning the modelling is accurate) we may as well just work on mitigation, because there is no possible way we get anywhere near this target globally. Like, it's just not going to happen. That's reality.
|
The modelling has been pretty darn accurate. We already
have to work on mitigation.
Again, 1.5° carries with it substantial effects on sea level, food production, and natural disasters. Mitigation is already understood to be required for what is already baked in.
The 2050 goal is to avoid much worse