Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Yeah. And I’m not sure that their mandate necessarily extended to settling for anyone other than themselves. In other words, they probably could have settled on behalf of the organization to remove themselves from the suit (and TBF the liability of the organization would have been the weakest part of the case). Instead, they settled on behalf of the participants and tried to ensure that, via an NDA, the allegations would never surface. An alternative - a settlement to compensate the accuser, plus an open investigation and programs to be better in the future.
|
This is one of the many many baffling things here. HCs legal risk
should have been pretty limited, unless it is demonstrated that they were enablers.
It seems they settled to make sure nobody found out they were enablers and continued to enable over and over.