Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebot
Standing up to a bully, tilt, in cash games rationality and odds doesn't always become the only factor, no matter the stakes.
If she had called with J high on the river, that would be a little more suspicious, but would just be a bluff catcher if she believed he was on a straight draw.
Just someone with sour grapes about losing a hand IMO to someone he clearly feels he is better (so she didn't cheat all the other hands but did this one because it was out of character despite he still having the best odds?)
|
Yep, and why would she let the river run twice if she knew what he had? And why would she call after the flop? Every move she made was the wrong one if she knew what he had. I guess if she knew what he had and knew which cards were coming up, she did the right thing. But if they had a system that knew all that, then why pick less obvious moments to take advantage?
It seems like she is probably staked, not for her poker skills, and made some questionable decisions about money she didn't care about that snowballed.