Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
Sure, but you’re just changing the argument so it doesn’t really matter.
|
If I'm coming across like I'm changing the argument, then communication is failing to occur.
Quote:
|
The point being that he didn’t set out to move Gaudreau and Tkachuk to cover weaknesses at C and D, so suggesting that he did and that’s why it wouldn’t make sense to go move a lesser D than the one we got for help on the wing, in turn, makes no sense.
|
The point I'm seeing is that he made moves deliberately for the purpose of covering weaknesses at C and D, and he's not going to undo those moves to fill a hole at a less important position.
You seem to have the idea that Treliving won Weegar in a lottery and has no idea what to do with an extra defenceman, so he needs to get rid of one.