Quote:
Originally Posted by b1crunch
I'm fine with that interpretation, but it's my opinion that money/profit will always be the number 1 (likely only) driver for those decisions. Disney (or any other large corporation) won't push a narrative of any kind unless they think it makes them money. Which is the exact same scenario now with PP and his choices for caucus. He chose who he did for very calculated reasons. And that's fine. Promoting an inclusive, diverse image for your organization is a positive thing. I really see now problem with any of it. Hence, people who the use the word "woke" for these things are ridiculous.
Alright, I'm done with this one. Thanks again for the conversation. Appreciate the back and forth.
|
I think Disney and PP are two sides of the same coin. Disney didn't want to come out against the FL legislation, because it really doesn't have anything to do with them, it's polarizing, and the people who passed it have huge power over their operations. But enough of their staff (and LGBTQ are highly over represented in show business) complained that they felt they had to. I doubt Bob Chapek is a social justice warrior, he just wants to make money.