Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Did I say that? I mean, you quoted my post, so it was right there for you to read. When you have to change what the other person said, in order to refute it, that's usually not the strongest argument.
I was responding to the argument that Hanifin 'is what he is'. He is the same age as Kylington, and has been better than Kylington everyone of the 7 years they have both been pros. So, IMO, arguing that Kylington still has upside, but Hanifin is what he is, is nothing more than a veiled shot at Hanifin, and is a completely empty argument.
|
You flat out said he's been playing for the last 7 years just not always in the NHL like Hanifin. Hanifin has way more NHL experience and is a very good player but Kylington has way less NHL expereince so even though they are the same age Kylington has more potential to grow IMO as he gains more NHL experience. This was my point earlier and you argued that you don't get it.
Kylington also hardly played anywhere in 20/21. Literally played 8 games.
Hanifin is the better player but Kylington has more room to grow and really how much more can Hanifin grow after 500+ games in the league already. Maybe more NHL playoff experience will help him but that probably doesn't make sense to you either.