Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5
Yeah, nice try kiddo. Show me one example where I downplayed the atrocities of the British. I am well aware of their shameful history.
You and psychnet are exactly the same. You're both so used to communicating in snarky drive-bys, that you have no actual ability to have a straight conversation about a topic.
|
I didn't say you downplayed the atrocities of the British.
I pointed out you said the Queen (someone who ruled during some fairly gross and noteworthy atrocities) had done as well as one could expect.
I also pointed out you responded to a video explaining one of those atrocities with a whataboutism about quoting a tweet from someone with a hammer and sickle and how bad that is.
If even the act of quoting a post with a hammer and sickle in the profile photo is bad, how morally repugnant do you think referring to someone who actually oversaw African concentration camps as "about as solid and stable of a monarch as one can hope for" is?
You can whine about snark or whatever if you want but that's not interesting to me. We're having a straight conversation. If you want to pull the shoot by going off on some personal rant, that's your prerogative but it's kind of lame.