Quote:
Originally Posted by Acey
Your opinion is that somebody who commits, for example, 50 murders should be given the chance to rehabilitate. I disagree with this, and there's no book of human code that says you're right nor I.
I'm doing my best to phrase the position that bad people should stay in jail as my opinion, but it seems to not go both ways.
|
Let’s say the chance of the mass murder rehabilitating is 0.0001%. They’re going to be in prison for the rest of their life anyway, why wouldn’t you attempt to rehabilitate over that period of time? What do you lose?
You seem to think that everyone having a chance at parole is the same as everyone getting out of prison. That’s not what I or anyone else is saying, but that they should have the chance even if it’s 1/10000 that actually earns it.
Your position doesn’t make any sense because if your goal isn’t rehabilitation you should be arguing for the death penalty instead of just holding them until they die in prison. How pointless is that?